File Today
- NEC Lawsuit -
■ Tremors
■ Slowed movement
■ Muscle stiffness
■ Impaired posture and balance
■ Loss of unconscious movements
■ Changes in speech and/or writing
• Sepsis
• Potential Neurological damage
• Abdominal pain and swelling
• Lethargy
• Refusing to eat
• Lack of weight gain
• Sepsis
• Potential Neurological damage
• Abdominal pain and swelling
Sponsored by
Goldwater Law Firm
Sponsored by
Goldwater Law Firm
Manufacturers of infant formula have knowingly used dangerous ingredients in their products for decades without notifying parents of the potential dangers. Decades of research across multiple studies have produced probable connections between cows' milk-based formula and Necrotizing Enterocolitis. Now is the time to hold the manufacturers accountable.
The Guardian Legal Network can connect qualified claimants to attorneys ready and willing to represent their cases. Call or complete our no-cost claim review today. Don’t wait to pursue the justice you deserve.
Bob Goldwater is the Founder and Managing Partner of the Goldwater Law Firm. For over 30 years, he has built a nationwide network of experienced and aggressive law firms dedicated to helping people recover compensation after being injured in an accident, as well as people harmed by dangerous drugs, defective medical devices, and other faulty products.
With a mission to provide fierce and compassionate legal help, the Goldwater Law Firm and its partners fight for the justice that clients deserve. If you've been injured due to someone else’s negligence, let the Goldwater Law Firm and its network of firms fight to get you the maximum compensation for your case.
Possibly, SBS and other GI injuries are part of this litigation, so we recommend you fill out the form above, and we will contact you within 24 hours to verify your eligibility.
Overall, NEC affects one in 2,000 to 4,000 births (approx. 9000 infants a year), or between one percent and five percent of neonatal intensive care unit admissions. The disease occurs in nearly 10 percent of premature infants but is rare in full-term infants.
No, this is a mass tort litigation. While similar to a class-action lawsuit, mass tort lawsuits differ significantly. In a class-action lawsuit, a group of plaintiffs with similar claims against a defendant is represented collectively by a member of the group. The group is treated as a single entity, and any settlement or judgment is distributed evenly among all members. Individual plaintiffs do not need to prove their own damages separately.
In contrast, a mass tort claim involves multiple individual lawsuits filed by plaintiffs who allege harm from the same defendant. These cases are often consolidated for pre-trial proceedings to streamline the process, but each plaintiff must prove their own damages and losses individually. This allows for more personalized compensation based on each plaintiff's specific circumstances.
Complete our no-cost claim review today. After completing the eligibility form, either through our 24/7 call center or online, you will be contacted in 24 hours should you qualify. You will be connected to an attorney experienced in product liability cases afterward.
Risks of Necrotizing Enterocolitis
Injuries Associated with NEC
What is Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC)?
Background & Research
Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is a severe disease affecting the intestines of premature infants, usually occurring within the first two weeks of life in formula-fed babies. Bacteria infect and inflame the intestinal wall, leading to weakened walls that can crack and leak germs into the abdomen, potentially causing serious infection or death if untreated.
Infections from NEC often require surgery, which can result in further gastrointestinal issues like Short Bowel Syndrome (SBS). SBS involves the surgical removal of parts of the intestine, reducing nutrient absorption and increasing health risks for the infant.
If your infant was diagnosed with NEC (Necrotizing Enterocolitis), Short Bowel Syndrome (SBS), or another gastrointestinal injury you may be able to file a claim for potential compensation.
The Connection Between NEC and Infant Formula
Research links NEC to certain cow milk-based infant formulas. A 1990 study found NEC was 6-10 times more common than in those fed breast milk alone.
In 2011, Johns Hopkins Medical Institution discovered that extremely premature babies fed human donor milk were less likely to develop NEC than those fed standard premature infant formula derived from cow’s milk.
Infant formula manufacturers face numerous lawsuits for failing to warn about the NEC risk. They must inform parents about the potential dangers of cow milk-derived formulas to prevent further harm.
Take action now to help protect more children from manufacturers' negligence.
1.) Complete the no-cost claim review form
2.) We will contact you within 24 hours
3.) We will assist you determining your eligibility
If your infant was diagnosed with NEC (Necrotizing Enterocolitis), Short Bowel Syndrome (SBS), or another gastrointestinal injury you may be able to file a claim for potential compensation.
Claim Evaluation Process
Complete the pre-qualification form
Complete the contact form
Brief call with New Case Specialist
Speak to your attorney
This is a Mass Tort, Not a Class Action
What's the difference?
In a mass tort, victims are treated as individuals and the specific merits of each claim are taken into consideration. In a class action, every victim has a similar injury and is treated identically.
The benefit of mass tort litigation is that plaintiffs have more power in settlement negotiations which ultimately lead to significantly greater payouts compared to class actions.
Mass Tort Payments
Victims getting what they deserve
2024 - Manufacturing giant Mead Johnson was ordered to pay $60 million to parents after their baby formula was found liable for putting preemies at increased deadly disease risk.
Ongoing - $10 billion settlement
Roundup weed killer linked to Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma and other cancers
2020 - $2.1 billion verdict for 22 claimants
Asbestos in Johnson & Johnson's talcum powder linked to ovarian cancer
2015 - $2.37 billion settlement for 9,000+ claimants
Actos drug by Takeda Pharmaceuticals linked to bladder cancer
Please be advised that certain states may consider this an attorney advertisement for legal services paid for by a non-attorney spokesperson. Guardian Legal Network is an advertising group that represents lawyers jointly advertising their services. Guardian Legal Network is not a law firm or lawyer referral service.
You may be entitled to compensation if you or a loved one have been injured by a dangerous drug, medical device or product. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision that should not be based solely upon advertisements. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of the legal services performed by other lawyers. Results are not guaranteed.
You should not rely upon any information herein as legal or medical advice. Any medical decision is important. Please consult your physician before altering usage of any drug.
By contacting Guardian Legal Network, you agree to receive a call back by up to two different legal service providers, even if you are on the "Do Not Call" registry. If there are multiple participating legal service providers, matching of an initial inquiry to a specific legal service providers is done by an internal random process. Some cases may be transferred to other attorneys, discuss with your attorney. Guardian Legal Network is not otherwise affiliated with or responsible for the representations or services provided by the legal service providers.
By visiting this site and/or replying to our TV Advertisements, you agree that Guardian Legal Network is not responsible or liable for any claim, loss or damage or any kind, directly or indirectly resulting from your use of any law firm, legal advice or any information obtained from Guardian Legal Network. By placing a call or entering Guardian Legal Network getguardianlegal.com (and the links accessible through this site) you expressly acknowledge your understanding and agreement to all of the disclaimers and agreements contained herein.
Please be advised that certain states may consider this an attorney advertisement for legal services paid for by a non-attorney spokesperson. Guardian Legal Network is an advertising group that represents lawyers jointly advertising their services. Guardian Legal Network is not a law firm or lawyer referral service.
You may be entitled to compensation if you or a loved one have been injured by a dangerous drug, medical device or product. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision that should not be based solely upon advertisements. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of the legal services performed by other lawyers. Results are not guaranteed.
You should not rely upon any information herein as legal or medical advice. Any medical decision is important. Please consult your physician before altering usage of any drug.
By contacting Guardian Legal Network, you agree to receive a call back by up to two different legal service providers, even if you are on the "Do Not Call" registry. If there are multiple participating legal service providers, matching of an initial inquiry to a specific legal service providers is done by an internal random process. Some cases may be transferred to other attorneys, discuss with your attorney. Guardian Legal Network is not otherwise affiliated with or responsible for the representations or services provided by the legal service providers.
By visiting this site and/or replying to our TV Advertisements, you agree that Guardian Legal Network is not responsible or liable for any claim, loss or damage or any kind, directly or indirectly resulting from your use of any law firm, legal advice or any information obtained from Guardian Legal Network. By placing a call or entering Guardian Legal Network getguardianlegal.com (and the links accessible through this site) you expressly acknowledge your understanding and agreement to all of the disclaimers and agreements contained herein.
References
ACS Medical Content and News Staff. “Study Finds Possible Link Between Hair Straightening Chemicals and Uterine Cancer.” American Cancer Society, October 26, 2022.
Bertrand, Kimberly. “25-Year-Long Study of Black Women Links Frequent Use of Lye-Based Hair Relaxers to a Higher Risk of Breast Cancer.” PBS. Public Broadcasting Service, July 14, 2021.
“Bisphenol A (BPA) Factsheet.” Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, April 7, 2017.
Eberle, Carolyn E., Dale P. Sandler, Kyla W. Taylor, and Alexandra J. White. “Hair Dye and Chemical Straightener Use and Breast Cancer Risk in a Large US Population of Black and White Women.” Wiley Online Library. International Journal of Cancer , December 3, 2019.
“Endocrine Disruptors.” National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, August 18, 2022.
“Formaldehyde in Hair Smoothing Products: What You Should Know.” U.S. Food and Drug Administration, February 3, 2021.
Llanos, Adana AM, Anna Rabkin, Elisa V Bandera, Gary Zirpoli, Brian D Gonzalez, Cathleen Y Xing, Bo Qin, et al. “Hair Product Use and Breast Cancer Risk among African American and White Women.” Oxford Academic. Carcinogenesis, June 9, 2017.
Mackar, Robin. “Hair Straightening Chemicals Associated with Higher Uterine Cancer Risk.” National Institutes of Health. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, October 17, 2022.
“Sodium Hydroxide.” Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, July 6, 2022.